Suite au succès de notre événement sur la veille technologique et scientifique d’octobre 2020, vous êtes cordialement invité-e-s à la présentation en avant-première des résultats de nos recherches sur le thème:
*** Cybersecurity Technologies: An overview of trends in Switzerland and abroad ***
Cet événement a lieu au Cyber-Defence Campus, EPFL Innovation Park, Bâtiment I (carte ci-dessous) en partenariat avec l’Université de Genève et la Trust Valley.
*** Programme de la soirée ***
18h00 Ouverture des portes
18h10 Nouvelles de l’association par Dr. Alain Mermoud
18h15 Présentation des résultats (promotion, veille Inoreader, formations) du stage d’Amina Bouslami (Swissintell)
18h30 Présentation des livrables de veille “Technology Market Monitoring” par Michael Tsesmelis (CYD Campus)
19h00 Discussion sur les méthodes de veille technologique et scientifique utilisées avec Dr. Dimitri Percia David (UNIGE)
Will deepfakes become the most powerful tool of misinformation ever seen? Can we mitigate, or govern, against the coming onslaught of synthetic media?
Our research focuses on the risks that deepfakes create. We highlight risks at three levels: the individual, the organizational and the societal. In each case, knowing how to respond means investigating to better understand the risks of what and to whom. And it’s important to note that these risks don’t necessarily involve malicious intent. Typically, if an individual or an organization faces a deepfake risk, it’s because they’ve been targeted in some way – for example, non-consensual pornography at the individual level, or fraud against an organization. But on the societal level, one of the things our research highlights is that the potential harm from deepfakes is not necessarily intentional: the growing prevalence of synthetic media can stoke concerns about fundamental social values like trust and truth.
“Echo chambers are not a new thing but the real replication of these memes happens online. Until now, a lot of polarization research has been around content production because this is what we can easily measure. This population of Firefox users consented to share their data – it’s like some people donate blood for the common good, here people donated their data for the common good,” said Head of the Data Science Lab, Assistant Professor Robert West, and the study’s lead author.
Whilst there have been previous, smaller studies that measured engagement in different ways, uniquely this new study was conducted in vivo, with users going about their normal daily lives, meaning that researchers were able to follow people in their natural habitat. With access to browsing history, unlike earlier studies, this research measured the time that users spent on particular websites, and reading particular articles, rather than whether a user had visited a site or not.
This additional data provided new evidence of a greater extent of polarization than observed in prior literature, showing that people engaged much more deeply with articles matching their political persuasion, spending more time on news sources matching their partisan beliefs than other information sources. […]